Assessing the Framework Conditions for Social Innovation in Rural Areas

Framework for the clarification and promotion of social innovation in rural areas

Description

The “Assessing the Framework Conditions for Social Innovation in Rural Areas” resource paper presents a comprehensive framework for understanding and promoting social innovation in rural areas, including digitalization, highlighting the distinct challenges faced in these regions, such as geographical remoteness, infrastructure deficiencies and declining populations. The paper further emphasizes the role of digitalization in rural areas and how it impacts social innovation by supporting the adoption of new business models, teleworking and community engagement. This paper’s proposed approach includes a dashboard with five dimensions and 17 sub-dimensions related to social innovation, aiding in the translation of qualitative inputs into quantitative indices. The goal is to create a comprehensive database of information related to local social innovation, and to transform what are largely qualitative inputs into quantitative indices that can be compared across time and place. This innovative approach circumvents the difficulties encountered in measuring social innovation by proposing a systematic framework for the evaluation and support of rural social innovation ecosystems, and proposes an approach that can help policymakers understand the local social innovation ecosystems, with particular emphasis on such rural-specific elements as land use, and to benchmark a variety of relevant policy areas across different territories.

Technology

  • Online community
  • Sensor

The paper promotes digitalization in rural areas as a transformative tool that can fulfil local needs and enhance connectivity. It offers examples of how social and traditional innovations can be linked and used collectively to tackle a variety of issues, such as those related to health, the environment and migration. It puts forward the IMPROVE (Involving the community to co-produce public services) project in Västernorrland, Sweden as an example of an open innovation or “living lab” approach, being a sustainable public service solution for homecare in peripheral areas. The solution makes use of such technologies as cameras for night-time monitoring and sensors for incontinence management, improving the quality of life of both carers (less travel time for the provision of care) and seniors (greater independence). The paper goes on to underscore the specificity of social innovation in rural contexts and emphasizes how land management approaches can foster social innovation through the integration of technological advances with civic activities, mentioning the example of the Threave Gardens Landscape Restoration Project in Scotland, which made use of new land restoration technologies as well as of community-driven land management initiatives. The study goes on to discuss how digital platforms facilitate new business models, citing the increased use of digital tools during the COVID-19 crisis and highlighting their integration into various aspects of daily life, and explains how digital platforms can encourage community engagement. On this issue, it gives the example of Germany's Digital Villages projects in which digital tools are leveraged for the provision of essential services, the support of local economies and the encouragement of social inclusion.

Target

  • Public sector
  • Civil society organizations
  • Rural communities

The paper can be beneficial to a diverse audience, including policymakers, researchers, social enterprises, and community leaders. Policymakers may learn from its insights in the design of targeted strategies that support social innovation in rural areas, addressing specific local challenges. Researchers, on the other hand, can benefit from the comprehensive framework and proposed metrics applied in the study, supporting studies and analyses of social innovation ecosystems in rural areas. Finally, social enterprises, non-profit organizations and international development agencies can gain an understanding of rural ecosystems, supporting the design and implementation of effective intervention projects and the identification of priority areas for investment and support.

Impact

The paper aims to support public sectors in such activities as policymaking, providing a systematic dashboard that can help in understanding rural social innovation ecosystems. This tool facilitates the better benchmarking of rural regions in support of data-driven interventions and decisions, and empowers such local actors as civil society, social enterprises and rural communities through the promotion of innovative projects that leverage local resources and technology, while also enhancing community resilience. The potential positive impacts of the paper include the stimulation of economic development through the encouragement of local entrepreneurship and job creation in rural areas.

Four Betters

  • Better production
  • Better environment

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 1: No poverty
  • SDG 2: Zero hunger
  • SDG 3: Good health and well-being
  • SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth
  • SDG 9: Industry, innovation, and infrastructure
  • SDG 11: Sustainable cities and communities
  • SDG 17: Partnerships for the goals
For detailed description of each attribute and parameter, check the AgriTech Observatory Taxonomy >

Analytics

Explore analytics related to this entry

Technology prevalence

Loading analytics data...

Source: FAO AgriTech Observatory

Entry type breakdown

Distribution of observatory entries by Entry Type.

Loading analytics data...

Source: FAO AgriTech Observatory

Logo de la Digital Public Good Alliance

L'Observatoire AgriTech est reconnu comme un bien public numerique par la Digital Public Good Alliance